Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the image-sizes domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/vhosts/i-tw.com.tw/httpdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the ultimate-addons-for-gutenberg domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/vhosts/i-tw.com.tw/httpdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: 呼叫 _load_textdomain_just_in_time 函式的方式不正確。Text Domain 為 astra 的語言套件載入過早觸發,這通常是由於外掛或佈景主題某些程式碼中的指示器過早執行所造成,而語言套件應該在 init 動作之後才載入。 請參閱〈WordPress 的偵錯功能〉以進一步了解相關資訊。 (這項訊息新增於 6.7.0 版) in /var/www/vhosts/i-tw.com.tw/httpdocs/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property nxs_wpAddnEngine::$k is deprecated in /var/www/vhosts/i-tw.com.tw/httpdocs/wp-content/plugins/nxs-snap-pro-upgrade/nxs-snap-pro-upgrade.php on line 11
他被控偷拍女同事更衣 辯忘帶走行車記錄器你信嗎 – 我是在地人

他被控偷拍女同事更衣 辯忘帶走行車記錄器你信嗎

Booking.com

(更新:新增動新聞)
台北市一名20多歲葉姓正妹今年4月在她打工的餐廳儲藏室內換衣服時,驚見一旁被人放置一台機車用行車記錄器,控訴薛姓男同事是偷拍色狼。薛男喊冤辯稱只是隨手將行車記錄器放在鐵架上,離開時忘記帶走。士林地檢署採信薛男證詞將他不起訴,但葉女不服,再議成功,全案已發回士檢繼續偵辦中。據了解,30多歲薛姓男子平時兼兩份差,早上在手搖飲料店上班,晚上則在內湖一處美食街餐廳工作;而20多歲葉姓正妹長相清秀,兩人是美食街餐廳同事。葉女提告指控,當晚下班她在餐廳儲藏室內更換衣服後,發現一旁鐵架上有一個不明發光物體,仔細一瞧,竟然是一台正在拍攝的行車記錄器,嚇得趕緊報案。遭指控偷拍的薛男則喊冤稱,案發前一天,他拿著新買的行車記錄器要請朋友幫忙安裝,但朋友因為太忙而婉拒,他才一直將機器帶在身上,案發當天他更衣時,隨手將行車記錄器放在鐵架上,卻忘記帶走,離開餐廳後才想起。薛男說,他當時曾折返儲藏室,但遍尋不著行車記錄器,還一度用Line問葉女,當時葉女回他:「我人在警察局!」他雖感到一頭霧水,仍然主動到警察局說明,強調自己絕無偷拍意圖。士林地檢署認為,薛男應為不小心的成份居多,而薛男能獲不起訴的最大關鍵點,在於行車記錄器有錄到薛男隨手放置的畫面,檢察官認為,一般偷拍者放好秘錄器後,都會不斷調整角度,或以遮蔽物遮蔽,避免被人發現,但薛男將行車記錄器放在架上後,並沒有調整角度或遮掩,因此認定薛男沒犯意,日前將他不起訴。但葉女認定薛男故意置放行車記錄器偷拍她換衣服,向高檢署聲請再議成功,目前全案已發回士林地檢署繼續偵查中。(顏凡裴、實習記者林冠吟/台北報導)【更多新聞,請看《蘋果陪審團》粉絲團】
出版時間:17:19
更新時間:21:05 報導來源:蘋果日報【原文網址

Booking.com

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *

返回頂端